Friday, February 13, 2004

Why isn't this story HUGE? 

I posted about this once already, but it bears repeating.
WASHINGTON -- The White House stepped back from a high-profile assertion by President Bush, in his January 2002 State of the Union Address, that U.S. forces had uncovered evidence of a potential attack against an American nuclear facility.

In the speech, Mr. Bush warned of a terrorist threat to the nation, saying that the U.S. had found "diagrams of American nuclear power plants" in Afghanistan.

Coming just months after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks -- and as U.S. forces were on the hunt for al Qaeda in Afghanistan -- the statement was offered as evidence of the depth of antipathy among Islamic extremists, and of "the madness of the destruction they design."

"Our discoveries in Afghanistan confirmed our worst fears," Mr. Bush told Congress and the nation in the televised speech. He said "we have found" diagrams of public water facilities, instructions on how to make chemical arms, maps of U.S. cities and descriptions of U.S. landmarks, in addition to the nuclear-plant plans.

Monday night, the White House defended the warnings about Islamic extremist intentions, but said the concerns highlighted by Mr. Bush were based on intelligence developed before and after the Sept. 11 attacks, and that no plant diagrams were actually found in Afghanistan. "There's no additional basis for the language in the speech that we have found," a senior administration official said.
Say what you will about Nigerien yellowcake--at least that story was backed up by faulty British intelligence and phony Italian documents. This, apparently, was made up out of whole cloth!! The above excerpt is from the Wall Street Journal, so it's not like major news organizations don't have the goods. This is about 500x more important that Bush and TANG, and 500000x more important than Kerry being in the same place once as Jane Fonda. What gives?
Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?